There is perhaps nothing more
counter to the idea of holiness than the reality of politics.
Both terms are in dire need of re-framing.
 |
Wisława Szymborska (1923-2012) |
Politics has long been
mired as the realm of individuals who seem to serve only themselves. Last
summer, a generation that was said to have given up on the political system decamped
to the arena of politics and occupied it, in a variety of movements across the
world. The months since that summer have returned many to the more cynical
stance towards the political arena, where those who were cynical of these movements
to begin with were waiting. This summer promises to be even more political.
Holiness has also been
lost to the “regular world” as an aspiration. Too loaded, it seems to belong to
those interested in separating from the world, rather than embracing it. Modernity
has pushed holiness and its “rumor of angels” out of the world, and
spiritualistic new-age has only strengthened that assumption.
A new frame for holiness, and a
new frame for politics, is needed – and this week’s parsha might inform both of
those. Parashat Kedoshim, the Torah’s “Holiness Code”, opens with the following famous lines:
And the Lord
spoke to Moses, saying,
and say to them:
Be holy,
for I, the Lord,
your God, am holy. (Leviticus 19:1-2)
|
וַיְדַבֵּר ה' אֶל מֹשֶׁה לֵּאמֹר:
דַּבֵּר אֶל כָּל עֲדַת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל
וְאָמַרְתָּ אֲלֵהֶם:
קְדֹשִׁים תִּהְיוּ
כִּי קָדוֹשׁ אֲנִי ה' אֱלֹהֵיכֶם.
(ויקרא
יט:א-ב)
|
What is this holiness? The
Sifra, the early Rabbinic commentary on the Torah, explains poignantly:
You
shall be holy: you shall be separate.
|
:קדושים תהיו – פרושים תהיו
|
The Sifra’s reading (quoted by Rashi) is in line with a
classic understanding of holiness as separation. Just as God is utterly
separate from this world, “wholly Other” as Rudolph Otto put it, the holy person
must become wholly separate from the world. In this concept, the social world
is a place of temptation, sin and profanity – and holiness is the act of
separating from it.
But this is not the only
understanding of Holiness. The Hasidic rebbe Rabbi Kalonymos Kalman Epstein of
19th century Cracow, in his book Maor vaShemeh, attacks the separatist understanding,
and claims that holiness is only achievable through a social movement, through
community:
A person might mistakenly thing that the
meaning of “Be Holy” is that if a person isolates themselves,
separating themselves from society, that they can attain holiness. But the
truth is that… while separation helps to avoid the obstacles to Divine
service, in order to achieve holiness one must join a group of
spiritual people, who worship in earnest, and to join with them in their
service – be it prayer or study... Indeed the majority of mitzvot must
all be performed in an assembly with other seekers, and through this one can
attain the highest holiness.
This is why Rashi smartly commented first
that “this chapter was given to the full community: ‘Speak to the entire
congregation of Israel…” and only then “say to them: Be holy’” for holiness can only be achieved within a
community of seekers, not through isolation. (Maor
vaShemesh, Kedoshim)
|
יוכל האדם לטעות שהפירוש הוא "קדושים תהיו" דהיינו שאם יתבודד עצמו ויפרוש עצמו מן הציבור יזכה אל הקדושה. והאמת הוא ש...זאת אינו מועיל אלא להנצל מן הדברים המעכבים עבודת השם יתברך, אבל להשיג הקדושה העליונה אינו זוכה עד שידבק עצמו אל אנשי השם עובדי ה' באמת ולהשתתף עמהם יחד בעבודה רבה הן בתפלה והן בלימוד התורה. ועיקר המצות הכל יהיה בכנסיה יחד עם מבקשי ה' ואז יוכל להשיג הקדושה העליונה.
לכן נתחכם רש"י ופירש קודם לזה מלמד שפרשה זו נאמרה בהקהל דהיינו שאינו זוכה אל הקדושה אלא בהקהל עצמו עם הציבור מבקשי ה' )
מאור ושמש - פרשת קדושים ד"ה וידבר
|
This understanding of holiness sees holiness not as “other”
from the world, but emanating from the world. The contents of the rest
of Leviticus 19, known as the “Holiness Code”, seem to strengthen this reading.
Our chapter includes a combination of ritual laws (e.g. all sacrificial meat
must be eaten on the same day) with a prescription of the basics of a just
society: don’t take bribes, don’t gossip, do not prejudice the rich nor the
poor, indeed – love your fellow as yourself. Leviticus 19 contains all you need
to know about living among people, and how to manage the many things that will necessarily
go wrong from such a social existence. And it claims that this is the path to holiness.
In other words: Holiness is achieved through politics (it is this philosophy
that another Polish rebbe, Abraham Joshua Heschel, branded so powerfully here
in America).
A different Polish rebbe, the late Nobel laureate WislawaSzymborska, rallies against those who shy away from politics. Between the lines
of her poem you can hear the call of artists who seek to stay away from “the
political” for fear of losing touch with the transcendent:
Children of Our Era
We are
children of our era;
our era is
political.
All
affairs, day and night,
yours,
ours, theirs,
are
political affairs.
Like it or
not,
your genes
have a political past,
your skin
a political cast,
your eyes
a political aspect.
What you
say has a resonance;
what you
are silent about is telling.
Either
way, it's political.
Even when
you head for the hills
you're
taking political steps
on
political ground.
Even
apolitical poems are political,
and above
us shines the moon,
by now no
longer lunar.
To be or
not to be, that is the question.
Question?
What question? Dear, here's a suggestion:
a
political question.
You don't
even have to be a human being
to gain
political significance.
Crude oil
will do,
or
concentrated feed, or any raw material.
Or even a
conference table whose shape
was
disputed for months:
should we
negotiate life and death
at a round
table or a square one?
Meanwhile
people were dying,
animals
perishing,
houses
burning,
and fields
growing wild,
just as in
times most remote
and less
political.
Szymborska calls on us to stop deluding
ourselves that the “apolitical life” is a loftier one, for such a thing is not
possible. Politics can bring us into the realm of the painfully trivial (conference
tables, or a ban on gossiping), but it is through the trivialities of politics
that life and death get negotiated. Read in conjunction with the Maor vaShemesh’s
theory of holiness, an aspirational reading of politics emerges. Those who seek
a life of meaning and holiness are invited to see that holiness is only
possible through the political act. Those who love the rush of politics are invited
to imagine a politics that see as its aspiration a moment when society will be
larger than the sum of its parts. Leviticus 19 suggests that the struggle
towards a just society is the struggle towards holiness; that deepest meaning,
a “rumor of angels,” is found not through a person alone in a forest, but only
through the constant jam session which is the social-political project: at
times disharmony and a-tonality might rule, but if you listen closely, and if
we do it right, an underlying rhythm will reveal itself amid the clamor of
politics. It is the beat of the holy.
Thanks to Neta Polisar (Amitei Bronfman ’05) for teaching me
this poem at last weeks Israeli Amitim Alumni Weekend on Mt. Meron. Neta spent the summer in a tent on Rothschild st in Tel Aviv, and is
currently volunteering as an organizer for a new Israeli workers union, Koach la’Ovdim, which rivals the establishment Histadrut union; he is awaiting the
resurgence of the Israeli tent protest, and acting behind the scenes towards its
reappearance.
Rabbi Mishael Zion | Bronfman Fellowships | Acahrei Mot- Kedoshim | Text and the City
